Comments on: Dispatches from the future? http://cityoftongues.com/2009/06/01/dispatches-from-the-future/ Tue, 31 Jan 2012 07:56:19 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Fitzroyalty http://cityoftongues.com/2009/06/01/dispatches-from-the-future/#comment-371 Tue, 02 Jun 2009 23:57:39 +0000 http://cityoftongues.com/?p=2126#comment-371 The Punch is already revealing its ugly News Ltd origins by breaching the copyright of a citizen journalist.

]]> By: James Bradley http://cityoftongues.com/2009/06/01/dispatches-from-the-future/#comment-367 Mon, 01 Jun 2009 12:52:06 +0000 http://cityoftongues.com/?p=2126#comment-367 She did, though I suspect la Huff’s fund’s interest in Australian questions is likely to be pretty limited . . .

]]> By: Saline http://cityoftongues.com/2009/06/01/dispatches-from-the-future/#comment-364 Mon, 01 Jun 2009 11:37:50 +0000 http://cityoftongues.com/?p=2126#comment-364 Re Swinburne:
Of course, Huffington announced a fund to revive the art of investigative journalism some months ago.

]]> By: James Bradley http://cityoftongues.com/2009/06/01/dispatches-from-the-future/#comment-363 Mon, 01 Jun 2009 11:28:00 +0000 http://cityoftongues.com/?p=2126#comment-363 Or there’s no restraint whatsoever:

http://themichaelduffyfiles.blogspot.com/2009/06/david-penberthy-pinch-of-punch-la-di.html

]]> By: Pavlov's Cat http://cityoftongues.com/2009/06/01/dispatches-from-the-future/#comment-362 Mon, 01 Jun 2009 11:14:49 +0000 http://cityoftongues.com/?p=2126#comment-362 ‘And it seems a pity a site which wants “to encourage a civil and illuminating standard of debate” begins by declaring “[i]t’s not a fancy, la-di-dah site aimed at people with three university degrees” (though even as I type that I can’t believe I’m allowing myself to rise to that particular bait).’

No, neither can I. If I can restrain myself, anyone can.

]]>